In these dark times ... perversion of language, is installed in our politicians in the habit of equating immoral for the offense, so you can link their own survival on the couch that may or may not demonstrate the existence of criminal acts.
say perversion as any student of the Faculty know that the criminal law is the "last resort", to be used only against the most extreme actions and deserving of reproach, and it is also constrained by important restrictions, the most cited of which is the presumption of innocence.
That means, conversely, that such principles or restrictions can be applied to criminal law, but not elsewhere. There is no presumption of innocence in politics, or family life or in civil law, order or other law. Here is what it does play is the burden of proof, of course, so that each party has to prove that you can try.
At this point, I guess you think my speech will talk about the people who accept gifts from other people, whether a crime or not and regardless that it may be immoral, etc, etc. No, let's talk about another fascinating case, but if you do not live in Leon may not have heard of it.
Let's talk about Auslli and Llionpedia .
If you know what the Wiquipedia , just explain that Llionpedia is the same, only Leonese language (or Asturleonesa, which I think is more accurate, but as we will not deepen because the server is not philologist). Behold Llionpedia was created from the Department of Education, New Technologies and Cultural Leonesa under the aegis of D. Abel Pardo Fernandez Eugenio , Councilman UPL and was controlled by that Department.
few days ago, several citizens complained that in this Llionpedia is contains several articles denying the Holocaust and showed a kind look into the Nazi thesis.
Hall's response was to wait to read the prosecution and action will be taken if there is an "unlawful."
QUESTION 1: Any opinion denying the Holocaust is a crime?
The answer is no. The regulation of these issues, including all restrictions related to the right to free expression of ideas and opinions has been restricted by the Constitutional Court in important decisions. It is therefore possible to display denialist views without any offense, if done with sufficient skill.
QUESTION 2: Is there crime here?
Since the date of this writing the Attorney has just filed the proceedings, and I personally have not studied the subject, I can only accept their approach and understand that in this case, indeed, there is no crime.
Anyway, would be curious to know what texts were sent to the Office and who made the translation. Just curious.
But, and here's the important thing, he said the prosecution is no crime, no there is no denial of the Holocaust, because as we said, not every denial is a crime.
At this point the way, one takes off his robe and dress stay in city, and continues.
OPINION : Los textos que se recogían en la Llionpedia eran textos de carácter acientífico que negaban el holocausto, dulcificaban el régimen Nacional Socialista y glosaban virtudes otros negacionistas, por más que no tengan un carácter delictivo.
PROFECÍA : Lo que se nos va a intentar hacer ahora, veremos desde dónde, es intentar confundirnos, diciendo que el archivo de la Fiscalía supone no que no haya delito (que es lo que ha dicho la Fiscalía), sino que no hubo textos filo-nazis y negacionistas (cuestión en la que la Fiscalía no puede entrar públicamente, por más que entendemos que tendrá su opinión).
FACT 1 : Abel Pardo, after start by saying that no illegality had been committed (as it appears that the prosecution proves him right), ended by saying that the texts in question were not Holocaust deniers or kind to the regime of Nazi Germany .
FACT 2: Abel Pardo intention to mislead public opinion by saying that the Author of the texts, who signed with the nickname Auslli could be any city, when in fact it was the first administrator of the site, the launched, and thus should be attached to your council. Asked about his identity, said he was not Auslli and could not tell who was because this would be a crime, given the current regulation of Privacy Act.
OPINION: In view of these statements, we can not know which is worse, the council revealed that some texts are not clearly deniers for the sake of saving his neck or worse, out of personal conviction ( that is, he did not really see how revisionist texts), he is Auslli, as pointed out by some unconfirmed rumors that Auslli the council is someone who is trying to hide or ideological affinity that this has occurred because it was responsible for overseeing the project.
Either way, the truth is that money has been used to cover all Leoneses a Nazi-leaning author, who not only allowed to publish his rants unscientific, but the question now to hide and protect without exposing your name to the public (being, and this is more a fact than an opinion, simply wrong that his identity not be disclosed for implementing the Data Protection Act).
In this case, the fact of whether or not a crime is, in my opinion, anecdotal. The important thing is the lack of scruples of some of our political representatives, the anything goes, the use of false and fallacious arguments to try to cover the trail of evil deeds. And dare trivialize the premeditated extermination of millions of people targeted because of race, religion or conscience.
Remember that the education of our children are in the hands of these people.
Should we tolerate as citizens, such actions and attitudes? Again, my opinion is no. We strongly demand accountability, now or at the polls. And perhaps ask, if this is what has become the Leon, so see whether it's time to give back and start thinking about what Leon.
That is another thing to hear.
According to the preface
U