U n year, coinciding with the festivities of the Winter Solstice, the Israelis and the Palestinians are killed each other.
acknowledge with regret that I can hardly take sides in a case like this, it is difficult to theorize when people are dying.
irrationally feel sympathy for the underdog, for the one is suffering, but I have lived long enough to understand that if you turn around the fate of the Palestinian state will not hesitate to destroy the Isralien, if you can.
Historically, I side with the Palestinians, who were driven from their homes and villages without compensation and without hope, and locked in a land that could barely support them. I do not care what the Jews suffered during World War II, Europeans never had to meet its debt at the expense of the Palestinians, which had nothing to do with it. but at the cost of sacrifice. And while we could have done the same with the other groups massacred, imprisoned and killed during the conflict simply because of their ethnicity, ideology or personal habits.
The fact that the creation of the State of Israel or the division of Persia, among other things equally worthy of praise, have served to keep the war, poverty and ignorance one of the richest areas the world, avoiding that could be done with the real power could certainly be achieved imagine who has not had anything to do. And we have benefited greatly, so ...
not worth to mention that it is the state of Israel that created and supported Hamas as a means to prevent a stable and pacified Palestine deprived him of the chance to put his boot on it from time to time.
For in all this there is only one truth: it is punishing the innocent. And that is unacceptable.
was Sinibaldo dei Fieschi (eminent jurist and the name of Pope Innocent IV), the left set back in the thirteenth century, that collectives can not sin or commit crimes in order to end the collective punishment inflicted on the cities for the crimes of one of its citizens. We have not done much attention in the almost eight centuries.
continue to condemn the son for the crimes of the father, the stranger by another stranger. Is what is happening to the Jews in all countries in which they lived (imaginary crimes, most of the time) and is the same as the Israelis have been doing for years not only with the Palestinians (Semitic people like them) but with other minority groups (like the Jews of African origin).
And is the very basis of this war. For a Palestinian commits a heinous crime (murder of an innocent person with a missile) is written to hundreds of innocent Palestinians (who have not launched the missile, or even know how or when it was made). Anything goes to kill the guilty, or alleged perpetrator, the most of the time.
Is this self-defense? Obviously not. Not so much for the disproportion of weapons as it is exercised against people who have nothing to do with the attack. Using an analogy, it's as if someone came to us in a bar with a knife to defend, quemásemos the local parishioners inside.
Does the vast majority of those who have died in recent months, regardless of their side, were guilty of something? Did they decide statehood Israel and the expulsion of the Palestinians between 1947 and 1948? Did you create and support to Hamas? Were they killed or suffering of another human being, by whatever means? "They tried to obtain better results in surveys of voting intentions and then in the next election?
No. They were the most ordinary people trying to make ends meet, caring for their children, keep your job, get ahead ... or were children. Many crimes have been committed over the past sixty years, but none of them can be attributed to those who die and suffer ... unless you have finished paying any guilty by mere chance. But calm, rest most comfortably in their homes, beyond human justice.
Oddly, the problem to accept this logic not only seems a matter of religion and a right based on the "eye for an eye", but many Christians American Protestants remarkably, seem to have forgotten the very foundations of their moral and their right, justifying the killing of innocents as a means to punish the guilty.
Or maybe when they turn their gaze to the thirteenth century, they prefer to listen to the Archbishop of Narbonne, Arnaldo Amalric.
acknowledge with regret that I can hardly take sides in a case like this, it is difficult to theorize when people are dying.
irrationally feel sympathy for the underdog, for the one is suffering, but I have lived long enough to understand that if you turn around the fate of the Palestinian state will not hesitate to destroy the Isralien, if you can.
Historically, I side with the Palestinians, who were driven from their homes and villages without compensation and without hope, and locked in a land that could barely support them. I do not care what the Jews suffered during World War II, Europeans never had to meet its debt at the expense of the Palestinians, which had nothing to do with it. but at the cost of sacrifice. And while we could have done the same with the other groups massacred, imprisoned and killed during the conflict simply because of their ethnicity, ideology or personal habits.
The fact that the creation of the State of Israel or the division of Persia, among other things equally worthy of praise, have served to keep the war, poverty and ignorance one of the richest areas the world, avoiding that could be done with the real power could certainly be achieved imagine who has not had anything to do. And we have benefited greatly, so ...
not worth to mention that it is the state of Israel that created and supported Hamas as a means to prevent a stable and pacified Palestine deprived him of the chance to put his boot on it from time to time.
For in all this there is only one truth: it is punishing the innocent. And that is unacceptable.
was Sinibaldo dei Fieschi (eminent jurist and the name of Pope Innocent IV), the left set back in the thirteenth century, that collectives can not sin or commit crimes in order to end the collective punishment inflicted on the cities for the crimes of one of its citizens. We have not done much attention in the almost eight centuries.
continue to condemn the son for the crimes of the father, the stranger by another stranger. Is what is happening to the Jews in all countries in which they lived (imaginary crimes, most of the time) and is the same as the Israelis have been doing for years not only with the Palestinians (Semitic people like them) but with other minority groups (like the Jews of African origin).
And is the very basis of this war. For a Palestinian commits a heinous crime (murder of an innocent person with a missile) is written to hundreds of innocent Palestinians (who have not launched the missile, or even know how or when it was made). Anything goes to kill the guilty, or alleged perpetrator, the most of the time.
Is this self-defense? Obviously not. Not so much for the disproportion of weapons as it is exercised against people who have nothing to do with the attack. Using an analogy, it's as if someone came to us in a bar with a knife to defend, quemásemos the local parishioners inside.
Does the vast majority of those who have died in recent months, regardless of their side, were guilty of something? Did they decide statehood Israel and the expulsion of the Palestinians between 1947 and 1948? Did you create and support to Hamas? Were they killed or suffering of another human being, by whatever means? "They tried to obtain better results in surveys of voting intentions and then in the next election?
No. They were the most ordinary people trying to make ends meet, caring for their children, keep your job, get ahead ... or were children. Many crimes have been committed over the past sixty years, but none of them can be attributed to those who die and suffer ... unless you have finished paying any guilty by mere chance. But calm, rest most comfortably in their homes, beyond human justice.
Oddly, the problem to accept this logic not only seems a matter of religion and a right based on the "eye for an eye", but many Christians American Protestants remarkably, seem to have forgotten the very foundations of their moral and their right, justifying the killing of innocents as a means to punish the guilty.
Or maybe when they turn their gaze to the thirteenth century, they prefer to listen to the Archbishop of Narbonne, Arnaldo Amalric.
0 comments:
Post a Comment